by RenegadeMonk » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:27 pm
The problem with the throw application for the morote uke in kokutsudachi is that this technique is usually (can't think of an exception) the start of a sequence: Hiean sandan, yondan and godan all show this technique as the beginning of a sequence of moves that are IMO difficult to show as being against a downed opponent.
In H.Godan and bassai dai there is a morote uke in kosa dachi (cross legged stance) and IMO both of these translate simply and easily as entries/grabs in order to throw with the next movement.
H.Nidan is the first example of morote uke in zenkutsudachi and interestingly this ends a sequence, but, does the preceding technique (gyakuzuki) place the hands in position for this to be the completion of a throw? I don't think so personally, although as a collar and lapel grab like the one in H.Godan it fits, since the following technique (270d turn into low block) easily translates as a throw.
I am sure that in isolation the morote uke movement can be made into a throw, but I think that without the context of the kata we run the risk of missing out on actual learning opportunities. After all, you can only see the throw if you already know the throw, and if you know it why do you need the kata? If however you understand the technique in the context of the sequence within the kata then you can set about working out why that technique follows and precedes the other techniques. Understanding why it is where it is will help you understand something you may not already know about fighting that perhaps you can apply in other circumstances.
David Burton
It's called Shotokan, not Shoto-can't